Film Comment: Tom Hardy’s ‘Bane’ vs Heath Ledger’s ‘Joker’

4

‘Definitely the Joker’

If anyone who saw The Dark Knight is asked what they liked best about the film, this is almost always the response. The bar for playing a Batman villain was well and truly raised by Heath Ledger, immortalised not only on screen but off screen as his ‘Joker’ became his legacy to cinema. Some say the part drove him mad, others who worked on the film tell of Ledger’s total immersion in the character off-set as he altered his walk and talked for hours on end to his own reflection perfecting his ‘Joker’ voice. For me Heath Ledger’s ‘Joker’ is as striking and memorable as Marlon Brando’s ‘Godfather’ or Jonny Depp’s ‘Captain Jack Sparrow’. I have a great deal of sympathy for whoever had to follow his performance: even Cinderella’s ass-ugly stepsisters ain’t got the feet to fill them shoes.

Whether Nolan twisted his arm or not, Inception star Tom Hardy really gave his role as Bane a hard hitting shot. Aesthetically, Bane is on par with the Joker for having a distinctive look: the Joker’s smile was pretty special, but Bane takes orthodontistry to a whole new level with his Hannibal Lecter style mouthpiece (am I the only one who was annoyed that we never saw it taken off?).  In terms of a voice, yes it was inaudible at times, but Batman’s been croaking away for years! I actually liked Bane’s voice; I was expecting some stereotypical hard man grunt but was pleasantly surprised with his posh-tinny-tones.

Where Bane struggled to kindle the intellectual romance that blossomed between the Joker and Batman (‘unstoppable force meets an immovable object’), he made up for in his impressive strength and fondness of fisticuffs.

All this considered…I still prefer the Joker. ‘BUT WHY?’ I shout in my head, since opinion with no reason does not make for a good film comment. I suppose I could reason that it’s down to some of Bane’s failings: where does his motivation to complete the mission of the League of Shadows come from when it’s leader clearly didn’t like him? What does the mask actually do other than give Tom Hardy a tough time acting with his eyebrows? Was he copying the Joker in giving a button to the public and wanting human nature to take over? Why does he save a little girl when he’s such a bastard? For me, Nolan doesn’t seem to give Hardy as much of a stand-alone character as he gave Heath, and relies on Batman Begins to give Bane a motive. A little lazy maybe?

Even with this criticism, Hardy’s performance as ‘Bane’ is still incredibly powerful. The ending especially adds another dimension to the character, one that was a total surprise. In any other film franchise, Hardy’s ‘Bane’ would be iconic. Yet, whilst Hardy’s input to the trilogy will be remembered as a great performance, Ledger’s ‘Joker’ will go down as an all time classic performance. It is Ledger’s commitment to making every aspect of the Joker seem real that swings it, every movement and every word comes with meticulous calculation, the likes of which Hardy cannot compete with from behind his metal mask.

Share.

About Author

avatar

4 Comments

  1. avatar

    “Was he copying the Joker in giving a button to the public and wanting human nature to take over?” – He never did that… think about it. The button was never given to an “anonymous Gothamite”….

    • avatar
      Matt Timmiss on

      He gave a button attached to a bomb that would blow up the people of gotham to a citizen of gotham, it was up to them whether they pressed it or not (this is before we know who actually has the button), seems pretty similar?

  2. avatar

    I think Tom Hardy did a great job as the villain. Like man, he made me feel unbelievably terrified of him sometimes (also, I watched TDKR in IMAX so his face seemed to appear up-close-and-personal sometimes). Not to mention that he knows his stuff too. He wasn’t a dumb villian and albeit he was the protector of Talia, he wasn’t just a criminal following a leader, he could think and command those around him by himself. 

    Also, towards the end, I felt for him. He tried to protect Talia’s innocence and keep her safe and eventually fell in love with her (unless the love Talia meant was guardian love, unlike romance). Also the fact that he’s in pain all the time and the machine on his face only really dulls the pain. That’s rough. I have to be put to sleep just to get my wisdom teeth out and then doped up on drugs so I don’t feel pain. I can’t imagine living with it everyday.

    I just loved Bane. I feel like I care more about him than the Joker. Like I was OBSESSED with the Joker after The Dark Knight. But he’s a sociopath who had no goals, he just wanted to cause chaos. The interesting thing about the Joker was that you knew nothing about him. He never tells the truth about his scars and seemingly doesn’t exist in any database. I feel like Bane has depth *because* of the past we know about. There’s more to him than the “I’m going to destroy Gotham” gig. 

  3. avatar
    TheGremlinKing on

    Agreed, Tom Hardys Bane was brilliant and will in time gain more respect. But Ledgers Joker, will always tilt a bit more heavy. For one It was VERY impressive, performance wise. Two, it was also THE iconic Batman villain, done to stunning perfection. Tom Hardy’s Bane I’ll will proudly admit is my favorite by a narrow margin, but the character he played doesn’t have the pull Ledgers does. IMHO, they were equally fantastic and telling, but as I’ve given before, one will always have the edge over the other, which is okay.

Leave A Reply